People v. De Berry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. De Berry

73 A.D.2d 652, 422 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14484

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 73 A.D.2d 652 (People v. De Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. De Berry, 73 A.D.2d 652, 422 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 6, 1978, convicting him of rape in the first and second degrees, sodomy in the first and second degrees and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence as a second felony offender. Case remitted to Criminal Term for a hearing in accordance herewith and appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Criminal Term is to file its report with all convenient speed. At the sentencing proceedings following his conviction, defendant was arraigned on a "prior offense information” arising out of a 1962 conviction, by plea of guilty, to robbery in the second degree, for which defendant had served more than 10 years in prison. Defendant contended that the documents submitted to prove that conviction were all forgeries, asserted that he was never advised of his right to a trial by jury when he pleaded guilty in 1962, and claimed that his counsel was ineffective because he never filed a notice of appeal from that judgment of conviction. The minutes of those proceedings were not submitted to the court. The sentencing court conducted a hearing on the question of whether defendant was the same person who was convicted of the prior offense, and properly refused to entertain defendant’s contention that the prior conviction was "unconstitutionally obtained” because his attorney allegedly neglected to file a notice of appeal (see People v Luciano, 46 NY2d 767, 769). However, pursuant to CPL 400.21, the court should have required proof that defendant was advised of his right to a trial by jury when he pleaded guilty in 1962 (see People v Brown, 67 AD2d 949; see, also, People v Owens, 58 AD2d 587). Therefore, we remit to Criminal Term for a hearing on that question. Titone, J. P,, Mangano, Rabin and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 6, 1978, convicting him of rape in the first and second degrees, sodomy in the first and second degrees and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence as a second felony offender. Case remitted to Criminal Term for a hearing in accordance herewith and appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Criminal Term is to file its report with all convenient speed. At the sentencing proceedings following his conviction, defendant was arraigned on a "prior offense information” arising out of a 1962 conviction, by plea of guilty, to robbery in the second degree, for which defendant had served more than 10 years in prison. Defendant contended that the documents submitted to prove that conviction were all forgeries, asserted that he was never advised of his right to a trial by jury when he pleaded guilty in 1962, and claimed that his counsel was ineffective because he never filed a notice of appeal from that judgment of conviction. The minutes of those proceedings were not submitted to the court. The sentencing court conducted a hearing on the question of whether defendant was the same person who was convicted of the prior offense, and properly refused to entertain defendant’s contention that the prior conviction was "unconstitutionally obtained” because his attorney allegedly neglected to file a notice of appeal (see People v Luciano, 46 NY2d 767, 769). However, pursuant to CPL 400.21, the court should have required proof that defendant was advised of his right to a trial by jury when he pleaded guilty in 1962 (see People v Brown, 67 AD2d 949; see, also, People v Owens, 58 AD2d 587). Therefore, we remit to Criminal Term for a hearing on that question. Titone, J. P,, Mangano, Rabin and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 A.D.2d 652, 422 N.Y.S.2d 733, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-de-berry-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack