People v. Dayter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dayter

49 A.D.2d 654, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10490

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 24, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 654 (People v. Dayter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dayter, 49 A.D.2d 654, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10490 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered June 14, 1974, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of the crime of burglary in the third degree. Concededly, the record in the instant case does not disclose compliance with the procedure set forth in CPL 400.21 for the establishment that defendant was a second felony offender. However, it is readily apparent that such procedure was designed to establish the validity of the predicate felony. Here such validity is conceded and in no way disputed. Therefore, any error in failing to comply literally with CPL 400.21 is harmless. We find no merit in any additional issues raised by the defendant and, accordingly, the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered June 14, 1974, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of the crime of burglary in the third degree. Concededly, the record in the instant case does not disclose compliance with the procedure set forth in CPL 400.21 for the establishment that defendant was a second felony offender. However, it is readily apparent that such procedure was designed to establish the validity of the predicate felony. Here such validity is conceded and in no way disputed. Therefore, any error in failing to comply literally with CPL 400.21 is harmless. We find no merit in any additional issues raised by the defendant and, accordingly, the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 654, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dayter-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack