People v. Dayson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dayson

121 A.D.2d 650, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58636

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 23, 1986·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), rendered April 7, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and criminal use of a firearm in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The prosecutor’s remarks concerning reasonable doubt, while not ideal, were not prejudicial (see, People v Cheek, 121 AD2d 649 [decided herewith]; People v Robinson, 83 AD2d 887). The defendant’s remaining contentions, including that his sentence was excessive, are without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), rendered April 7, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and criminal use of a firearm in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The prosecutor’s remarks concerning reasonable doubt, while not ideal, were not prejudicial (see, People v Cheek, 121 AD2d 649 [decided herewith]; People v Robinson, 83 AD2d 887). The defendant’s remaining contentions, including that his sentence was excessive, are without merit. Gibbons, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Kooper, JJ., concur.

People v. Dayson, 121 A.D.2d 650, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58636 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

121 A.D.2d 650 (People v. Dayson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related