People v. Days
This text of 31 A.D.3d 574 (People v. Days) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), rendered June 21, 2004, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court properly admitted into evidence a transcript of testimony given by a prosecution witness at the first trial in this matter (see CPL 670.10 [1]; People v Diaz, 97 NY2d 109, 117 [2001]; People [575]*575v Arroyo, 54 NY2d 567, 574 [1982], cert denied 456 US 979 [1982]; People v Simmons, 36 NY2d 126, 130 [1975]).
The trial court providently exercised its discretion in precluding expert testimony as to the defendant’s susceptibility to police interrogation techniques (see People v Lee, 96 NY2d 157, 162 [2001]; People v Cronin, 60 NY2d 430, 433 [1983]; People v Koury, 268 AD2d 896 [2000]; People v Green, 250 AD2d 143 [1998]; People v Bajraktari, 154 AD2d 542 [1989]; People v Lea, 144 AD2d 863 [1988]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 A.D.3d 574, 817 N.Y.S.2d 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-days-nyappdiv-2006.