People v. Daymon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Daymon

266 A.D.2d 857, 698 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11933

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 857 (People v. Daymon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Daymon, 266 A.D.2d 857, 698 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11933 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]). We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in summarily denying her request for assignment of new counsel. Defendant indicated during the plea colloquy that she had discussed the matter fully with assigned counsel and that she was “satisfied with his advice and counsel”. The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]). We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in summarily denying her request for assignment of new counsel. Defendant indicated during the plea colloquy that she had discussed the matter fully with assigned counsel and that she was “satisfied with his advice and counsel”. The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 857, 698 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-daymon-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack