People v. Dawson

220 P.2d 587, 98 Cal. App. 2d 517, 1950 Cal. App. LEXIS 1890
California Court of Appeal·Decided July 21, 1950·No. Crim. 2656·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

DOOLING, J.

Appellant appeals from an order of the superior court denying his motion to file a notice of appeal nunc pro tunc. The time for filing notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction in his case was admittedly long past when the motion was made.

Appellant made a showing that after his conviction and before time for filing notice of appeal had expired he was stricken with an illness which totally incapacitated him from filing notice of appeal in pro. per. and that his attorney failed to file a notice although appellant had discussed such filing with him.

Our Supreme Court has repeatedly held the timely filing of a notice of appeal to be jurisdictional subject to no qualification by reason of hardship. (People v. Behrmann, *518 34 Cal.2d 459 [211 P.2d 575] ; People v. Slobodion, 30 Cal.2d 362, 365-366 [181 P.2d 868] ; People v. Lewis, 219 Cal. 410, 413-414 [27 P.2d 73]; Estate of Hanley, 23 Cal.2d 120, 122-123 [142 P.2d 423, 149 A.L.R. 1250].) The rule is harsh in its application to a case like the present, but unless the Supreme Court sees fit to relax it we are bound to give it application. In Estate of Hanley, supra, 23 Cal.2d at page 123 the court said:

“In the absence of statutory authorization, neither the trial nor appellate courts may extend or shorten the time for appeal (citations), even to relieve against mistake, inadvertence, accident or misfortune (citations).”

This case cannot be brought within People v. Slobodion, supra, 30 Cal.2d 362, where under the peculiar facts the court found a constructive filing of the notice of appeal. Under the circumstances it appears that appellant should have some avenue for relief in the courts, but the existing decisions make it clear that it cannot be by the late filing of a notice of appeal.

Order affirmed.

Nourse, P. J., and Goodell, J., concurred.

Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied August 17, 1950. Carter, J., voted for a hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dawson, 220 P.2d 587, 98 Cal. App. 2d 517, 1950 Cal. App. LEXIS 1890 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950).

220 P.2d 587 (People v. Dawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Benoit
514 P.2d 97 (California Supreme Court, 1973)
People v. Hales
244 Cal. App. 2d 507 (California Court of Appeal, 1966)
People v. Lewis
333 P.2d 428 (California Court of Appeal, 1958)
People v. Burns
314 P.2d 79 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
People v. Martiz
279 P.2d 568 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)
People v. Walsh
277 P.2d 73 (California Court of Appeal, 1954)
People v. McBride
264 P.2d 991 (California Court of Appeal, 1953)
People v. Cox
260 P.2d 1050 (California Court of Appeal, 1953)