People v. Dawley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dawley

172 A.D.2d 1076, 571 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6501

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 26, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 172 A.D.2d 1076 (People v. Dawley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dawley, 172 A.D.2d 1076, 571 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6501 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

? Motion to extend time to move for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied as unnecessary. Memorandum: The motion to extend the time to move for leave to appeal is unnecessary because the time to move to appeal from an order denying a motion made pursuant to CPL article 440 does not begin to run until the order is served upon defendant. Present —Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

? Motion to extend time to move for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied as unnecessary. Memorandum: The motion to extend the time to move for leave to appeal is unnecessary because the time to move to appeal from an order denying a motion made pursuant to CPL article 440 does not begin to run until the order is served upon defendant. Present —Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 A.D.2d 1076, 571 N.Y.S.2d 394, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dawley-nyappdiv-1991.