Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Dawkins

People v. Dawkins

142 A.D.3d 672, 36 N.Y.S.3d 824
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 24, 2016
Docket2013-04917
StatusPublished

This text of 142 A.D.3d 672 (People v. Dawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Dawkins, 142 A.D.3d 672, 36 N.Y.S.3d 824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), imposed April 17, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the portion of his sentence which included the imposition of a fine was excessive *673 (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337 [2015]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; cf. People v Cookhorne, 117 AD3d 1484 [2014]).

Eng, P.J., Chambers, Austin, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Cookhorne
117 A.D.3d 1484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 A.D.3d 672, 36 N.Y.S.3d 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dawkins-nyappdiv-2016.