People v. Dawkins

142 A.D.3d 672, 36 N.Y.S.3d 824
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Dawkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 A.D.3d 482
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 24, 2016·No. 2013-04917·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), imposed April 17, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the portion of his sentence which included the imposition of a fine was excessive *673 (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337 [2015]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; cf. People v Cookhorne, 117 AD3d 1484 [2014]).

Eng, P.J., Chambers, Austin, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dawkins, 142 A.D.3d 672, 36 N.Y.S.3d 824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

142 A.D.3d 672 (People v. Dawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Cookhorne
117 A.D.3d 1484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)