People v. Dawkins
110 A.D.2d 777, 488 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48682
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1985·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We find that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in ruling upon defendant’s Sandoval motion. The probative worth of the evidence on the issue of defendant’s credibility outweighed any possible prejudicial effect (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371).
We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find that they are either without merit or unpreserved for our review (CPL 470.05 [2]). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Dawkins, 110 A.D.2d 777, 488 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 777 (People v. Dawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hilliard v. Scully
648 F. Supp. 1479 (S.D. New York, 1986)
Federal Insurance v. Argitakos
637 F. Supp. 814 (S.D. New York, 1986)