People v. Dawkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dawkins

110 A.D.2d 777, 488 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48682

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 110 A.D.2d 777 (People v. Dawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dawkins, 110 A.D.2d 777, 488 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

We find that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in ruling upon defendant’s Sandoval motion. The probative worth of the evidence on the issue of defendant’s credibility outweighed any possible prejudicial effect (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find that they are either without merit or unpreserved for our review (CPL 470.05 [2]). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We find that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in ruling upon defendant’s Sandoval motion. The probative worth of the evidence on the issue of defendant’s credibility outweighed any possible prejudicial effect (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find that they are either without merit or unpreserved for our review (CPL 470.05 [2]). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 A.D.2d 777, 488 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dawkins-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack