People v. Davone J.

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 22, 2026
Docket2023-06109
StatusPublished

This text of People v. Davone J. (People v. Davone J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Davone J., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Davone J. - 2026 NY Slip Op 02419

skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Court Decisions Resources About

People v Davone J.

2026 NY Slip Op 02419

April 22, 2026

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Davone J. (Anonymous), appellant.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Decided on April 22, 2026

2023-06109, (Ind. No. 75909/22)

Colleen D. Duffy, J.P.

Barry E. Warhit

Lourdes M. Ventura

Lisa S. Ottley, JJ.

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Steven C. Kuza of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Jean M. Joyce, and Ann Bordley of counsel), for respondent.

[*1]

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Raymond L. Rodriguez, J.), rendered June 23, 2023, adjudicating him a youthful offender, upon his plea of guilty to criminal possession of a firearm, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contentions that his conviction of criminal possession of a firearm is unconstitutional are unpreserved for appellate review, since the defendant failed to raise those constitutional challenges before the Supreme Court (see People v David, 41 NY3d 90, 96; People v Cabrera, 41 NY3d 35, 42), and we decline to reach them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

In light of our determination, the defendant's remaining contention need not be reached.

DUFFY, J.P., WARHIT, VENTURA and OTTLEY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI