People v. Davis

Superior Court of Guam·Decided April 23, 2025·No. CF0332-23·Unknown

Opinion

l Fi·f~ED

a

2 a Qt ct:>tJ1~1~

i~lmr:tT"l mum'

3 g 5l8= 29

. f6"*L~'8"*» 3 -§?

4 ii£ :

Ht '** »is**»,.

pi--r' * =-'*~1=

uag§ g ;§_¢»

I" * Q

i "f"* Q w ~§°§;\5: ~.1.»-"I

5 "*5'§=.Z

6 IN THE THE SUPERIOR

SUPERIOR COURT

COURT OF

OF GUAM

GUAM

7

8 PEOPLE OF OF GUAM,

GUAM,

CRIMINAL CASE no.

NO. CF0332-23

CF0332-23

9 vs.

10 10 DECISION DECISION AND ORDER

11 ERIC ANTHONY DAVIS, ANTHONY DA VIS,

12 Defendant.

13 13

14 14 INTRODUCTION

15 15 This This matter theHonorable matter is before the HonorableVernon VernonP.

P.Perez

Perezon

onDefendant

DefendantEric

EricAnthony

Anthony Davis's

Davis's

16 16 ("Defendant") Motion to ("Defendant") Motion to Determine Sentencing Determine Sentencing .Range . Range forforViolations

Violationsofof99 G.C.A.

G.C.A. §§

17 17 67.401.1.

. 1.Deputy

DeputyPublic

Public Defender

Defender John

John P. Mon*ison representsDefendant Morrison represents Defendantand andAssistant

AssistantAttorney

Attorney

18 General O'Neil represents General Kathleen O'Neil represents the People of Guam ("the ("the Government").

Government"). Having reviewed 19 19 the pleadings, pleadings, the arguments presented,and arguments presented, andthe therecord,

record,the

theCourt

Courtnow

nowissues

issuesthe

thefollowing

following

20 20 Decision Decision and and Order.

21 BACKGROUND

22 22 On May

May 18,

18, 2023,

2023, Defendant was indicted with one Defendant was one count of of Possession

Possession with

with Intent

Intent to

23 23 Deliver Deliver aa Schedule Schedule II

II Controlled

Controlled Substance (As a First Degree Substance (As Degree Felony)

Felony) and one count

and one count of

24 Possession Possession of a Schedule II II Controlled

Controlled Substance (As aaThird Substance (As Third Degree DegreeFelony).

Felony). (Indictment, May (Indictment, May

25 18, 2023). Both 18, 2023). B9th felony felony charges

charges also have

have an

anattached

attachedNotice:

Notice:Commission

Commissionof

ofaaFelony

FelonyWhile

While on

26 26 Felony \ FelonyRelease.

Release. Id

IdThe charges

The chargesstem

stemfrom

fromallegations

allegationsthat

thatDefendant

Defendantwas

was in

in possession of seven

27 27 (7) resealable baggies containing containing 2.47

2.47 gross

gross grams

grams of

ofsuspected

suspected methamphetamine along with methamphetamine along with 28 28

People v.

v, Davis

Case No.

No. CF0332~23

CF0332-23

Decision Decision and Order

Page 11 of

of99

1 other drug paraphernalia after the dog paraphernalia the execution execution of

of aa traffic

traffic stop

stop on

on or

orabout

aboutMay

May 10,

10,2023.

2023. (Deel.

(Decl. of

of

2 Renaida Z. San Nicolas, Nicolas, Magistrate's

Magistrate's Compl.,

Con pl., May

May 11,

ll, 2023). .

3 October 18, 2024, Defendant On October Defendant filed the instant Motion. On On Oct ober 31§

October, 31; 2024,

2024, tthe

4 Government filed Government filed its Response. On On November

November8,8, 2024,

2024, Defendant

Defendant tiled

filed his Reply.

5 November 19, On November 19, 2024,

2024, the

the Court

Court heard

heard arguments

arguments on the

the Motion

Motion and

and subsequently

subsequently

6 placed the matter under under advisement.

7 DISCUSSION 8 At At issue before the

issue before the Court

Court is the applicable

is the applicable sentencing sentencing range

range for

for violations

violations of

of 99 G.C.A.

G.C.A. §§

9 67.401.1. There is 67.401.1. is no dispute dispute as

as to the

the sentencing

sentencing range

range applicable

applicable for the Second Charge of of

10 10 Possession of a Schedule H Possession II Controlled Substance (As a Third Degree Felony) or the Notice:

Substance (As

11 Commission of Commission of aFelony FelonyWhile

WhileononFelony

FelonyRelease

Releaseset

setforth

forthin

in the

the Indictment. As

Asan

aninitial

initial matter,

..

12 12 the Court acknowledges that Public Public Law

Law 37-113

37-113 was

was signed

signed into

into law

law on July

July 22,

22, 2024.

2024. Public

13 13 Law Law 37-113, amended 99 G.C.A.

37-113_ amended G.C.A. §§ 67.401.4(a)

67.40l.4(a) by

by addi~g

adding sentencing

sentencing guidelines

guidelines based

based on

on purity

purity

14 14 weight of and weight of controlled controlled substances

substances (fentanyl, fentanyl fentanyl analogue,

analogue, and methamphetatnine)

methamphetamine) and

15 15 removed removed the the applicability of Safety Valve of the Justice Safety Valve Act.

Act. This Decision

Decision and

and Order

Order only applies

applies

16 16 to violations violations of ofsection

section67.401 .1 prior to the enactment 67.401.1 enactment of of Public Law 37-113.

17 17 Statutory interpretation Statutory interpretationisis aa legal legal question

question and

and the

the Court's

Court's inquiry begins with the inquiry begins

18 18 language of statute. "The of the statute. "The plain plain meaning

meaning will

will prevail

prevail where

where there

there is

is no clearly stated legislative 19 19 intent to the contrary." People People v.

v. Robert,

Robert, 2019

2019 Guam 2 11 10 (citing ,i 10 (citing Data Mgmt.

Mgmt. Res., LLC v.

Res., LLC v.

20 Office of Ojice ofPub.

Pub. Accountability, 2013 Guam 27 1117).

,i 17). "[I]n

"[I]n determining

determining legislative intent, 1ntent, aa statute

21 should be read as a whole, should whole, and therefore, courts courts should

should construe

construe each

each section

section in conjunction

conjunction with

22 other .sections."

sections." Data

Data Mgmt.

Mgmt. Res.,

Res., LLC

LLC v.

v. O#

Off ofofPub.

Pub. Accountability,

Accountability, 2013

2013 Guam 27

27 11

,i 17

17

23 23 (quoting Sumitomo itomo Cons

Constr. CO. v.v..Gov

tr. Co. -Gov 't't of

of Guam,

Guam, 2001 Guam

Guam23

2311

,i 17). See also Amerault Amerault v.

v.

24 lntelcom Intercom Support Serve., Servs., Inc.,

Inc., 2004 Guam 23 ,i 14

23 11 14 ("In

("In determining

determining the

the plain

plain meaning

meaning of a

25 statutory provision, we look to the the meaning

meaning of the

the entire

entire statutory

statutory scheme

scheme containing

containing the provision

provision

26 for guidance."). , .

27 27 In this case, the Government argues argues that Defendant should be sentenced sentenced pursuant to 99

I

28 G.C.A. §§ 67.401.4(a)

G.C.A. 67.40l.4(a) and and subj et to

subject to~a sentencing

sentencing range

range of

of twenty

twenty to thirty years

to thirty years of

of imPirisonment,

imprisonment,

1li

People v.

v. Davis

Case No.

No. CF0332-23

CFQ332-23

Decision Decision and and Order

Page 2 of 9

1 while Defendant while Defendant.argues he he should

should be

be sentenced

sentencedpursuant

pursuantto

to 99 G.C.A.

G.C.A. §§ 67.401.4(e)

67.401.4(e) and

and subj act to

subject to

2 a sentencing range of sentencing range of zero to five five years

years ofofimprisonment

imprisonment as

(;l.S he

he does

does not

not have

have any

any prior

prior drug

drug

3 convictions. Section Sectiqn67.401

67.401.4 is entitled Prison'Terms for for Drug

Drug Offenders

Offenders and

and sets

sets forth various

4 sentencing provisionsfor sentencing provisions for aadefendant defendantconvicted

convictedof

ofviolating

violating99G.C.A.

G.C.A. §§ 67.401.-1,.Possession 67.40l.»l,Possession for

for

5 Illegal Illegal Delivery, Delivery, Dispensing

Dispensing ororManufacturing.

Manufacturing. SeCtion 67.401.4 in.eludes Section 67.401.4 includes fifteen fifteen (15)

(15)

6 subsections wtthinitit (67.401.4(a)-

subsections within (67.40l .4(a) --67.401.4(0)).

67.40l.4(o)). Each

Eachofofthese

these,.subsections

.. subsections provides

provides sentencing

7 guidelines depending depending on

on the

thefactors

factorsof

of the

the case,

case,with

withthe

theexception

exceptionof

ofsection

section67

67.40l.4(k)

.40 l .4(k) which

8 repealed by was repealed by P.L.

P.L. 35-005 (Apr. 4, 2019);

35-005 (Apr. 2019). ·The TheCourt

Courtfinds

finds ititappropriate

appropriate to consider

consider section

9 67.40l.4(a)

67.401.4(a) within withinthe

the broader

broader statutory scheme. SeeData scheme. See Data Mgmt.

Mgmt. Res.,

Res., LLC,

LLC, 2013 Guam 271117,

i-117;

10 10 Amerault, 2004 Guam Guam23. i1 14.

23 1114.

11 Defendantis Defenda~t "is charged

charged with

with possessing

possessing aa Schedule

Schedul~ II Controlled

Controlled Substance

Substance with intent to

12 deliver. Schedule deliver. II Controlled Substances Schedule II arelisted Substances are listedin

inAppendix

Appendix BB o_f

of the

the Guam

Guam Uniform

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Davis, (superctguam 2025).

People v. Davis (People v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bradshaw
81 S.W.3d 14 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)