People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Davis

251 A.D.2d 91, 674 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6684

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 251 A.D.2d 91 (People v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Davis, 251 A.D.2d 91, 674 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Sudolnik, J.), rendered December 2, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of SVa to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

Testimony from police officers that, prior to the subject robbery, defendant, who was previously known to the police, and his cohorts were following middle aged and elderly men and staring at their pockets does not constitute evidence of uncharged crimes (People v Mateen, 227 AD2d 350, lv denied 88 NY2d 989) and was admissible on the contested issues of identification and acting in concert, and to complete the narrative of the events surrounding the charged crime.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Sullivan, Nardelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Sudolnik, J.), rendered December 2, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of SVa to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

Testimony from police officers that, prior to the subject robbery, defendant, who was previously known to the police, and his cohorts were following middle aged and elderly men and staring at their pockets does not constitute evidence of uncharged crimes (People v Mateen, 227 AD2d 350, lv denied 88 NY2d 989) and was admissible on the contested issues of identification and acting in concert, and to complete the narrative of the events surrounding the charged crime.

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Sullivan, Nardelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 91, 674 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-davis-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack