People v. Davis

224 A.D.2d 324, 638 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1291
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 22, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme [325]*325Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered March 24, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court provided defendant with an adequate opportunity to confer with defense counsel immediately before the parties began to exercise their challenges to a panel of prospective jurors. Under the circumstances, the court properly exercised its discretion by setting a reasonable limit on the amount of time for defendant and counsel to confer (see, People v De Jesus, 42 NY2d 519, 523). We have reviewed defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur— Milonas, J. P., Wallach, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Davis, 224 A.D.2d 324, 638 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1291 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

224 A.D.2d 324 (People v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pierce
303 A.D.2d 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)