People v. Davis

222 A.D.2d 1115, 636 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14265
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 193 A.D.2d 1142

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence at trial, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v [1116]*1116Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), established a physical injury within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (9) (see, People v Pope, 174 AD2d 319, lv denied 78 NY2d 1079). We note that defendant’s remaining contention on appeal, that the failure to charge the jury on circumstantial evidence was error, is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to reach the issue as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Davis, 222 A.D.2d 1115, 636 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14265 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 1115 (People v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Pope
174 A.D.2d 319 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)