People v. Davis

209 A.D.2d 954, 620 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11954
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 16, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted, following a bench trial, of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]). He contends that the court erred in admitting the opinion of an emergency medical technician (EMT) regarding the time of death of the victim. We agree that the EMT lacked the necessary qualifications to render an expert opinion with respect to the time of death based on the presence of rigor mortis (see, Matott v Ward, 48 NY2d 455, 459; People v Barrett, 189 AD2d 879). The admission of that testimony, however, is harmless error (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 242). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 437), is sufficient to disprove the defense of justification. Nor is there any merit to defendant’s contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Finally, the sentence is neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J.—Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Davis, 209 A.D.2d 954, 620 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 954 (People v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Joon Ho Chin
267 A.D.2d 404 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)