People v. Davis

206 A.D.2d 832, 616 N.Y.S.2d 317
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 178 A.D.2d 424
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1994·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

Resentence unanimously reversed on the law, youthful offender adjudication reinstated and matter remitted to Oneida County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: County Court erred in vacating the youthful offender adjudication and resentencing defendant as an adult. Defendant was originally adjudicated a youthful offender after pleading guilty to robbery in the first degree and was sentenced to 2 Vs to seven years. Where the only error concerns the legality of the sentence imposed and the court was "act[ing] only * * * to legitimate the term of sentence imposed”, the proper remedy is to impose a new sentence consistent with the youthful offender adjudication as a matter [833]*833of law (People v Calderon, 79 NY2d 61, 67; see also, Matter of Kisloff v Covington, 73 NY2d 445, 452). We reinstate, therefore, the youthful offender adjudication and remit the matter to Oneida County Court for resentencing. (Appeal from Resentence of Oneida County Court, Murad, J.—Resentencing.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Davis, 206 A.D.2d 832, 616 N.Y.S.2d 317 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

206 A.D.2d 832 (People v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kisloff v. Covington
539 N.E.2d 565 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Calderon
588 N.E.2d 61 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)