People v. Davis

203 A.D.2d 818, 612 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4421
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 28, 1994·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered May 26, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

We have examined defendant’s claim that his negotiated sentence of 6 to 12 years as a second felony offender should be reduced in the interest of justice and find it to be without merit. The fact that defendant received a greater sentence than his codefendants does not require a modification of the sentence in light of the fact that County Court had a cognizable reason to impose different sentences. Defendant did not receive the harshest possible sentence under the circumstances and we find no compelling reason on this record to disturb the sentence imposed.

[819]*819Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Davis, 203 A.D.2d 818, 612 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4421 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

203 A.D.2d 818 (People v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PRIAL, MISTY L., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Prial
118 A.D.3d 1498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)