People v. Davis
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered May 23, 1984, adjudicating him to be [560]*560in violation of the terms of a sentence of probation, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
136 A.D.2d 559 (People v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.