People v. Davis

114 A.D.2d 970, 495 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54013
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 A.D.2d 177

Opinion

—Appeals by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fuchs, J.), both rendered February 9, 1984, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Davis, 114 A.D.2d 970, 495 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

114 A.D.2d 970 (People v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)