People v. Davis

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Davis

534 N.E.2d 313, 73 N.Y.2d 864, 537 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 12, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 534 N.E.2d 313 (People v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Davis, 534 N.E.2d 313, 73 N.Y.2d 864, 537 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2 (N.Y. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for a de novo consideration of the defendant’s appeal. That court erred in failing to assign new counsel after determining that the appeal presented a nonfrivolous issue (see, People v Casiano, 67 NY2d 906, 907).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, First Department, for a de novo consideration of the defendant’s appeal. That court erred in failing to assign new counsel after determining that the appeal presented a nonfrivolous issue (see, People v Casiano, 67 NY2d 906, 907).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 N.E.2d 313, 73 N.Y.2d 864, 537 N.Y.S.2d 475, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-davis-ny-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack