Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Davis

People v. Davis

480 N.E.2d 339, 64 N.Y.2d 1143, 490 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 15855
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 2, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 480 N.E.2d 339 (People v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Davis, 480 N.E.2d 339, 64 N.Y.2d 1143, 490 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 15855 (N.Y. 1985).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

[1144]*1144On this appeal, it is argued that a police officer’s instruction to defendant to place a plastic bag in his possession on the ground, and the officer’s subsequent search of the bag, were unsupported by reasonable suspicion as a matter of law. Reasonable suspicion involves a mixed question of law and fact, which is beyond the review powers of this court if there is evidence adduced at the suppression hearing which supports the determination made by the courts below. (People v Harrison, 57 NY2d 470, 477.)

In this case, defendant was a passenger upon a moped which was operated without license plates, at 2:30 a.m., in a high crime area. Neither defendant nor his companion could produce any form of identification. Upon the officer’s inquiry as to what was in a plastic bag in his possession, defendant removed a pair of pants from the bag, impliedly suggesting that the bag contained nothing else, whereupon a bulge appeared in the bottom of the bag from a heavy object within. The officer perceived the situation to be dangerous, and ordered defendant to place the bag on the ground. In the bag the officer discovered a .45 caliber weapon. We are presented with affirmed factual findings that the officer’s conduct was based upon reasonable suspicion under the circumstances, and that the officer perceived the situation to be a dangerous one. Accordingly, it cannot be said that the officer’s conduct was unwarranted as a matter of law.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Graham
134 A.D.3d 1047 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
In re Jakwon R.
110 A.D.3d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Shuler
98 A.D.3d 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Shackleford
57 A.D.3d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Holmes
36 A.D.3d 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Broome
187 A.D.2d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Hill
171 A.D.2d 1017 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Torres
543 N.E.2d 61 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Wilson
150 A.D.2d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Jones
138 A.D.2d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Vullis
131 A.D.2d 616 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Tepperman v. New York City Transit Authority
133 Misc. 2d 788 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1986)
People v. Lewis
123 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Larkins
116 A.D.2d 194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Roth
487 N.E.2d 270 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. McNatt
65 N.Y. 1046 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Brooks
65 N.Y. 1021 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
480 N.E.2d 339, 64 N.Y.2d 1143, 490 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 15855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-davis-ny-1985.