People v. Davis

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Davis

356 N.E.2d 290, 40 N.Y.2d 835, 387 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3006

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 14, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 356 N.E.2d 290 (People v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Davis, 356 N.E.2d 290, 40 N.Y.2d 835, 387 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3006 (N.Y. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on authority of People v Patterson (39 NY2d 288) and the case remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for review of the facts (CPL 470.40, subd 2, par [b]; 470.25, subd 2, par [d]). On other questions of law raised by defendant there was no prejudice, assuming error.

[836]*836Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli and Jones. Judges Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur on constraint of People v Patterson (39 NY2d 288).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on authority of People v Patterson (39 NY2d 288) and the case remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for review of the facts (CPL 470.40, subd 2, par [b]; 470.25, subd 2, par [d]). On other questions of law raised by defendant there was no prejudice, assuming error.

[836]*836Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli and Jones. Judges Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur on constraint of People v Patterson (39 NY2d 288).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 N.E.2d 290, 40 N.Y.2d 835, 387 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-davis-ny-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack