People v. Davis

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Davis

191 N.E.2d 674, 13 N.Y.2d 690

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 29, 1963

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 191 N.E.2d 674 (People v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Davis, 191 N.E.2d 674, 13 N.Y.2d 690 (N.Y. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed and the indictment dismissed upon the authority of People v. Meyer (11 N Y 2d 162). The police officer who preferred the vagrancy charge upon which appellant was arraigned acknowledged that it was merely a pretext upon which to hold him for the homicide. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Foster and Scilepfl Judges Dye and Burke dissent and vote to affirm upon the authority of People v. Weinstein (11 N Y 2d 1098).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and the indictment dismissed upon the authority of People v. Meyer (11 N Y 2d 162). The police officer who preferred the vagrancy charge upon which appellant was arraigned acknowledged that it was merely a pretext upon which to hold him for the homicide. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Foster and Scilepfl Judges Dye and Burke dissent and vote to affirm upon the authority of People v. Weinstein (11 N Y 2d 1098).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 N.E.2d 674, 13 N.Y.2d 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-davis-ny-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack