People v. Davis

Appellate Court of Illinois

People v. Davis

197 Ill. App. 629

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedFebruary 1, 1916

DocketGen. No. 21,072

StatusPublished

This text of 197 Ill. App. 629 (People v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Davis, 197 Ill. App. 629 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Criminal law, § 444*—when HU of exceptions need not contain plea of not guilty. On review of a judgment pf conviction in a criminal case, it is immaterial that the bill of exceptions does not show that a plea of not guilty was entered by or for defendant, since the place where such plea should appear is the common-law record and not the bill of exceptions. 4. Criminal law, § 444*—what is office of bill of exceptions. The use of a bill of exceptions in a criminal case is not to embrace in it matters of record, but to make a part of the record matters which otherwise would not be such.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Criminal law, § 444*—when HU of exceptions need not contain plea of not guilty. On review of a judgment pf conviction in a criminal case, it is immaterial that the bill of exceptions does not show that a plea of not guilty was entered by or for defendant, since the place where such plea should appear is the common-law record and not the bill of exceptions. 4. Criminal law, § 444*—what is office of bill of exceptions. The use of a bill of exceptions in a criminal case is not to embrace in it matters of record, but to make a part of the record matters which otherwise would not be such.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 Ill. App. 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-davis-illappct-1916.