People v. D'Avila

21 A.D.3d 905, 800 N.Y.S.2d 515
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 6, 2005·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), rendered August 3, 2004, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of the right to appeal was not valid because it was based on an incorrect statement of law (cf. People v Brown, 13 AD3d 548, 549 [2004]). However, the defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the sentencing court failed to exercise any discretion in imposing sentence (see CPL 470.05 [2]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. D'Avila, 21 A.D.3d 905, 800 N.Y.S.2d 515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

21 A.D.3d 905 (People v. D'Avila) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Smith
64 A.D.3d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Rosato
37 A.D.3d 741 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Rodriguez
32 A.D.3d 481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)