People v. Davidson

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Davidson

172 N.E.2d 574, 9 N.Y.2d 639

DecidedJanuary 12, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 172 N.E.2d 574 (People v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Davidson, 172 N.E.2d 574, 9 N.Y.2d 639 (N.Y. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed. After a hearing in a proceeding in the nature of coram nobis in the Kings County Court, defendant’s application to vacate a conviction for the crime of assault in the first degree (affd. 297 N. Y. 894), upon the ground the Trial Judge was biased, was denied. The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed and stated in a memorandum decision: “In our opinion, the finding against appellant’s claim of bias is amply supported by the minutes of the hearing.” This court agrees. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed. After a hearing in a proceeding in the nature of coram nobis in the Kings County Court, defendant’s application to vacate a conviction for the crime of assault in the first degree (affd. 297 N. Y. 894), upon the ground the Trial Judge was biased, was denied. The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed and stated in a memorandum decision: “In our opinion, the finding against appellant’s claim of bias is amply supported by the minutes of the hearing.” This court agrees. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 N.E.2d 574, 9 N.Y.2d 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-davidson-ny-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack