People v. David

234 A.D.2d 314, 651 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12795
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. David. Read the opinion of the Court — 234 A.D.2d 787

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered May 2, 1995, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

[315]*315Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record of the plea proceedings unequivocally demonstrates that his waiver of the right to appeal, which expressly encompassed all pretrial suppression rulings, was voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Accordingly, the current challenges to the court’s suppression ruling set forth in the defense counsel’s brief and in the defendant’s supplemental pro se brief are not properly presented for appellate review (see, People v Lyle, 221 AD2d 475; People v Velasquez, 181 AD2d 751). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. David, 234 A.D.2d 314, 651 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

234 A.D.2d 314 (People v. David) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Moissett
564 N.E.2d 653 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Velasquez
181 A.D.2d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Lyle
221 A.D.2d 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)