People v. David

65 N.Y. 809
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 1985·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The sentencing court exceeded its power in sentencing the defendant to lifetime probation because the prerequisites mandated by the Legislature were not met (Penal Law § 65.00 [1] [b]). Hence, the sentence was illegal and therefore reviewable despite the District Attorney’s failure to object (see, People v [811] Fuller, 57 NY2d 152, 156-157, n 3; People v Drummond, 40 NY2d 990, 992, cert denied sub nom. New York v Luis J., 431 US 908).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Boomer

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. David, 65 N.Y. 809 (N.Y. 1985).

65 N.Y. 809 (People v. David) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fuller
441 N.E.2d 563 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
New York v. Luis J.
431 U.S. 908 (Supreme Court, 1977)