People v. Davey

156 A.D.2d 989, 548 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16177
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By pleading guilty before the court conducted a hearing on his suppression motion, defendant forfeited his right to appellate review of his contention that voice identifi[990] cation evidence should have been suppressed (see, People v Fernandez, 67 NY2d 686; People v Simmons, 121 AD2d 483). Because defendant did not request youthful offender treatment at the time of sentencing, he cannot raise that issue on appeal (see, People v McGowen, 42 NY2d 905, rearg denied 42 NY2d 1015; People v Di Marcantonio, 117 AD2d 612, Iv denied 67 NY2d 882). We cannot conclude that imposition of the bargained-for sentence was harsh and excessive in the circumstances of this case. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Francis, J. — rape, first degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Davey, 156 A.D.2d 989, 548 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

156 A.D.2d 989 (People v. Davey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Torres
238 A.D.2d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)