People v. Daumen

107 A.D.2d 1009, 486 N.Y.S.2d 101, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42823

This text of 107 A.D.2d 1009 (People v. Daumen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Daumen, 107 A.D.2d 1009, 486 N.Y.S.2d 101, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Even though the question of the existence of probable cause was not pursued during the suppression hearing and the issue has not been preserved for appellate review (People v Adams, 57 NY2d 1035, 1037; People v Jones, 81 AD2d 22), we reach the merits and find that the police possessed the requisite probable cause to arrest defendant (see People v Brnja, 50 NY2d 366, 373; People v Oden, 36 NY2d 382, 384). Thus, the trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress her later identification at a “showup” and physical evidence seized following a consensual search. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J. — attempted burglary, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Oden
329 N.E.2d 188 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Brnja
406 N.E.2d 1066 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Adams
444 N.E.2d 33 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Jones
81 A.D.2d 22 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 A.D.2d 1009, 486 N.Y.S.2d 101, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-daumen-nyappdiv-1985.