People v. Darmetko

179 A.D.2d 836, 578 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 99

This text of 179 A.D.2d 836 (People v. Darmetko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Darmetko, 179 A.D.2d 836, 578 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 99 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

We reject defendant’s contention that the prison sentence he received of 2 Vs to 7 years was harsh and excessive. Not only was his plea entered in full satisfaction of a 45-count indictment, but another indictment was dropped as well. Furthermore, the sentence was in accord with the plea bargain. Under these circumstances, along with the fact that the sentence was well within the statutory guidelines (see, Penal § 70.00 [2] [b]; [3] [b]), we find no abuse of discretion in the sentence imposed (see, People v Mackey, 136 AD2d 780, lv denied 71 NY2d 899).

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mackey
136 A.D.2d 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 A.D.2d 836, 578 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-darmetko-nyappdiv-1992.