People v. Darby

304 A.D.2d 672, 757 N.Y.S.2d 486
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 14, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Miller, J.), rendered May 9, 2002, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Braatz, J.), upon her admission that she violated a condition thereof, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of driving while intoxicated.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is [673]*673without merit (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]). In addition, the defendant’s admission to the violation of probation was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9 [1983]).

Since the defendant has completed the sentence imposed, the issue of whether that sentence was excessive has been rendered academic (see People v Waddy, 240 AD2d 521 [1997]). Santucci, J.P., Krausman, McGinity, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Darby, 304 A.D.2d 672, 757 N.Y.S.2d 486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

304 A.D.2d 672 (People v. Darby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Russillo
27 A.D.3d 493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Eherts
21 A.D.3d 905 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)