People v. Dao
This text of 9 A.D.3d 401 (People v. Dao) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Brown, J.), dated July 18, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The County Court’s designation of the defendant as a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act was [402]*402supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law art 6-C; People v Smith, 5 AD3d 752 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 602 [2004]; People v Moore, 1 AD3d 421 [2003], lv denied 2 NY3d 743 [2004]; People v Brooks, 308 AD2d 99 [2003]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 A.D.3d 401, 779 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dao-nyappdiv-2004.