People v. Danso

174 N.Y.S.3d 602, 208 A.D.3d 1363, 2022 NY Slip Op 05330
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 28, 2022
DocketInd. No. 60/21
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 174 N.Y.S.3d 602 (People v. Danso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Danso, 174 N.Y.S.3d 602, 208 A.D.3d 1363, 2022 NY Slip Op 05330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Danso (2022 NY Slip Op 05330)
People v Danso
2022 NY Slip Op 05330
Decided on September 28, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on September 28, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
PAUL WOOTEN
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

2021-08571
(Ind. No. 60/21)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Alhusene Danso, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel; Gianna Gambino on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Ushir Pandit-Durant, J.), rendered November 18, 2021, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the imposition of mandatory surcharges and fees; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

However, as consented to by the People, we modify the judgment by vacating the surcharges and fees imposed on the defendant at sentencing (see CPL 420.35[2-a]; People v Green, 205 AD3d 1051, 1052; People v Douglas, 205 AD3d 732; People v Reeves, 203 AD3d 1181; People

v Sevaughn G., 199 AD3d 936, 937; People v Dyshawn B., 196 AD3d 638).

The defendant's remaining contention is academic in light of our determination.

BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., CHAMBERS, WOOTEN and FORD, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Islam
2024 NY Slip Op 06210 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Wilson
2023 NY Slip Op 06760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Porter
179 N.Y.S.3d 147 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 N.Y.S.3d 602, 208 A.D.3d 1363, 2022 NY Slip Op 05330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-danso-nyappdiv-2022.