People v. Daniels

163 A.D.2d 413
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Daniels. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 A.D.2d 667

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fisher, J.), imposed November 17, 1987, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, the sentence being an indeterminate term of 5 to 10 years’ imprisonment, upon his adjudication as a second felony offender, to run consecutively to a previously imposed indeterminate term of imprisonment of 8 to 16 years, upon his conviction of robbery in the first degree.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his sentence constituted cruel and inhuman punishment is without merit. The record does not support the defendant’s argument that he was given a consecutive sentence to punish him for asserting his right to a trial. As the Trial Judge explained, the pretrial offer of concurrent time was a benefit which the defendant rejected, so that he may not now complain that the benefit was withdrawn. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Daniels, 163 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

163 A.D.2d 413 (People v. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.