People v. Daniels
This text of 704 N.W.2d 703 (People v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,
v.
David D. DANIELS, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant from the July 20, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CORRIGAN, J., dissents and states as follows:
I continue to adhere to the views set forth in my dissenting statement in People *704 v. Curvan, 473 Mich. 896, 897, 703 N.W.2d 440 (2005).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
704 N.W.2d 703, 474 Mich. 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-daniels-mich-2005.