People v. Daniels
704 N.W.2d 703, 474 Mich. 887
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,
v.
David D. DANIELS, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant from the July 20, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CORRIGAN, J., dissents and states as follows:
I continue to adhere to the views set forth in my dissenting statement in People *704 v. Curvan, 473 Mich. 896, 897, 703 N.W.2d 440 (2005).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Daniels, 704 N.W.2d 703, 474 Mich. 887 (Mich. 2005).
704 N.W.2d 703 (People v. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Greene v. AP PRODUCTS, LTD.
704 N.W.2d 703 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2005)