People v. Daniel

49 A.D.2d 683, 370 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10528
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 18, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 683 (People v. Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Daniel, 49 A.D.2d 683, 370 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10528 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: In affirming these convictions we note that the exact issue raised on these appeals with respect to the production of an informant, indeed the very same informant, has been previously determined by us. In People v Law (48 AD2d 228) we held, under identical circumstances, that the production of the informant was not required. Nor were these appellants denied a public trial by reason of the closing of the courtroom during the testimony of certain police officers actively engaged in on-going drug investigations (People v Hinton, 31 NY2d 71). We have carefully reviewed the other issues raised and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance, third degree.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Mahoney and Del Vecchio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Jenkins
49 A.D.2d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.2d 683, 370 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-daniel-nyappdiv-1975.