People v. Daniel

161 N.E.2d 740, 6 N.Y.2d 985
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Daniel. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 N.Y.2d 821
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 8, 1959·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur, requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there, was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the admission in evidence of statements made by defendant of an incriminatory nature violated the rights of defendant under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals held that the statements were properly received in evidence and that defendant’s constitutional rights were not violated. [See 6 N Y 2d 821.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Daniel, 161 N.E.2d 740, 6 N.Y.2d 985 (N.Y. 1959).

161 N.E.2d 740 (People v. Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.