People v. Daniel

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Daniel

180 N.W.2d 209, 24 Mich. App. 366, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1724

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 3, 1970

DocketDocket Nos. 8,650, 8,651

StatusPublished

This text of 180 N.W.2d 209 (People v. Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Daniel, 180 N.W.2d 209, 24 Mich. App. 366, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1724 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendants in these consolidated appeals seek review of their March 27, 1967 convictions, on pleas of guilty, of assault with intent to rob being armed in violation of MCLA § 750.89 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.284).

[367]*367The people have filed a motion to affirm the convictions. GrCR 1963, 817.5(3).

Brief on appeal argues that the lower court’s examination of defendants at the plea proceedings failed to establish their participation in the crime and that the court failed to advise defendants of certain constitutional rights enumerated in Boykin v. Alabama (1969), 395 US 238 (89 S Ct 1709, 23 L Ed 2d 274).

The court’s examination of the defendants was sufficient to reveal their participation in the offense. Boykin v. Alabama, supra, is not retroactive. People v. Taylor (1970), 23 Mich App 595.

It is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed on which the decision of the cause depends are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI