People v. Daniel J. S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Daniel J. S.

48 A.D.2d 665, 371 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9678

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 A.D.2d 665 (People v. Daniel J. S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Daniel J. S., 48 A.D.2d 665, 371 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant (1) from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 5, 1974, adjudicating him a youthful offender, after his plea of guilty of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree (upon Indictment No. 1180-73), and sentencing him to a reformatory period of imprisonment and (2) as limited by his brief, from another reformatory sentence of the same court, imposed the same day, upon another youthful offender adjudication, after his plea of guilty of possession of weapons and dangerous instruments as a misdemeanor (upon Indictment No. 861-73). Both sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Judgment under Indictment No. 1180-73 affirmed. No opinion. Sentence under Indictment No. 861-73 modified, on the law, by reducing it to the time served. As so modified, sentence affirmed. A reformatory sentence for a misdemeanor cannot exceed one year, because a longer term than one year would be unconstitutional (see United States ex rel. Sero v Preiser, 377 F Supp 463). Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant (1) from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 5, 1974, adjudicating him a youthful offender, after his plea of guilty of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree (upon Indictment No. 1180-73), and sentencing him to a reformatory period of imprisonment and (2) as limited by his brief, from another reformatory sentence of the same court, imposed the same day, upon another youthful offender adjudication, after his plea of guilty of possession of weapons and dangerous instruments as a misdemeanor (upon Indictment No. 861-73). Both sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Judgment under Indictment No. 1180-73 affirmed. No opinion. Sentence under Indictment No. 861-73 modified, on the law, by reducing it to the time served. As so modified, sentence affirmed. A reformatory sentence for a misdemeanor cannot exceed one year, because a longer term than one year would be unconstitutional (see United States ex rel. Sero v Preiser, 377 F Supp 463). Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 665, 371 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-daniel-j-s-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack