People v. Daniel A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Daniel A.

259 A.D.2d 983, 689 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3324

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 259 A.D.2d 983 (People v. Daniel A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Daniel A., 259 A.D.2d 983, 689 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3324 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Adjudication unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal encompassed the original sentence of probation (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1), it did not encompass the resentencing following a hearing at which violations of probation were established. Upon review of the resentence, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe, and we decline to modify it as a matter of

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adjudication unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal encompassed the original sentence of probation (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1), it did not encompass the resentencing following a hearing at which violations of probation were established. Upon review of the resentence, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe, and we decline to modify it as a matter of

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 983, 689 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-daniel-a-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack