People v. Daniel A.
259 A.D.2d 983, 689 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3324
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 31, 1999·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Adjudication unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal encompassed the original sentence of probation (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1), it did not encompass the resentencing following a hearing at which violations of probation were established. Upon review of the resentence, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe, and we decline to modify it as a matter of
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Daniel A., 259 A.D.2d 983, 689 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3324 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).
259 A.D.2d 983 (People v. Daniel A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Strunkey
268 A.D.2d 492 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Rodriguez
259 A.D.2d 1040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)