People v. Dalrymple
188 N.E.2d 265, 12 N.Y.2d 892
This text of 188 N.E.2d 265 (People v. Dalrymple) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Dalrymple, 188 N.E.2d 265, 12 N.Y.2d 892 (N.Y. 1963).
Opinion
Order affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi. Judge Fuld dissents and votes to reverse and to order a hearing on the ground that, upon the allegations of defendant’s petition for coram nobis, a triable issue exists as to whether defendant had intelligently and understandably waived his right to counsel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
188 N.E.2d 265, 12 N.Y.2d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dalrymple-ny-1963.