People v. Dagata

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dagata

201 A.D.2d 740, 609 N.Y.S.2d 846

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 740 (People v. Dagata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dagata, 201 A.D.2d 740, 609 N.Y.S.2d 846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), rendered July 2, 1992, convicting him of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant argues that his convictions of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree were against the weight of the evidence. Upon the exercise of our factual [741]*741review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining claims are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), rendered July 2, 1992, convicting him of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant argues that his convictions of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree were against the weight of the evidence. Upon the exercise of our factual [741]*741review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining claims are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 740, 609 N.Y.S.2d 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dagata-nyappdiv-1994.