People v. DaCosta

245 A.D.2d 525, 666 N.Y.S.2d 494, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13217

Opinion

—Appeal by the de[526] fendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brill, J.), rendered July 5, 1995, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court conducted a proper inquiry as to defense counsel’s claimed conflict of interest (see, People v Gomberg, 38 NY2d 307, 314; People v Hunt, 227 AD2d 568).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and Lerner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. DaCosta, 245 A.D.2d 525, 666 N.Y.S.2d 494, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

245 A.D.2d 525 (People v. DaCosta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gomberg
342 N.E.2d 550 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Hunt
227 A.D.2d 568 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)