People v. Czechalenka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Czechalenka

251 A.D. 751, 295 N.Y.S. 527, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7373

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 751 (People v. Czechalenka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Czechalenka, 251 A.D. 751, 295 N.Y.S. 527, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion “for an order permitting the District-Attorney of Sullivan County or Meyer A. Novick, attorney for the appellant, to print record of this case, together with the appellant’s brief, for the purpose of perfecting the appeal taken therein, and to charge the cost thereof to the expenses of this trial pursuant to sections 606, 607 and 608 of the Correction Law,” denied. The court does not now pass upon the question as to whether the proposed printing disbursements on appeal would properly be included as an expense of the trial. The allowance of the item is in the first instance to be determined by the State or county officials. Hill, P. J., Crapser and Heffeman, JJ., concur; McNamee and Bliss, JJ., concur in denying the motion only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion “for an order permitting the District-Attorney of Sullivan County or Meyer A. Novick, attorney for the appellant, to print record of this case, together with the appellant’s brief, for the purpose of perfecting the appeal taken therein, and to charge the cost thereof to the expenses of this trial pursuant to sections 606, 607 and 608 of the Correction Law,” denied. The court does not now pass upon the question as to whether the proposed printing disbursements on appeal would properly be included as an expense of the trial. The allowance of the item is in the first instance to be determined by the State or county officials. Hill, P. J., Crapser and Heffeman, JJ., concur; McNamee and Bliss, JJ., concur in denying the motion only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 751, 295 N.Y.S. 527, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-czechalenka-nyappdiv-1937.