People v. Cutting

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cutting

271 A.D.2d 760, 706 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4190

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 760 (People v. Cutting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cutting, 271 A.D.2d 760, 706 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4190 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.), rendered September 29, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of arson in the third degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crimes of arson in the third degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to concurrent prison terms of 6 to 12 years and 3V2 to 7 years, respectively. Based upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree with defense counsel’s assertion that there are no nonffivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Defendant waived his right to appeal as part of a knowing, voluntary and intelligent guilty plea and was sentenced in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement and relevant statutory requirements. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.), rendered September 29, 1998, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of arson in the third degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crimes of arson in the third degree and reckless endangerment in the first degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to concurrent prison terms of 6 to 12 years and 3V2 to 7 years, respectively. Based upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree with defense counsel’s assertion that there are no nonffivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Defendant waived his right to appeal as part of a knowing, voluntary and intelligent guilty plea and was sentenced in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement and relevant statutory requirements. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 760, 706 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cutting-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack