People v. Cusick
This text of 111 A.D.2d 251 (People v. Cusick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), all rendered April 13,1983, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree under each of three indictments, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.
Judgments affirmed.
By pleading guilty defendant has waived his claim that he was not brought to trial within the 180-day statutory limit of the Agreement on Detainers (CPL 580.20 [III] [a]). The rights afforded by the Agreement on Detainers are neither fundamental [252]*252nor constitutionally guaranteed (United States v Lawson, 736 F2d 835; United States v Scheer, 729 F2d 164; United States v Palmer, 574 F2d 164, cert denied 437 US 907) and a violation of the procedural rules contained therein is not a jurisdictional defect which may survive a guilty plea (People v Vidal, 85 AD2d 701). Nor do the circumstances demonstrate a violation of defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial (CPL 30.20; People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 A.D.2d 251, 489 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cusick-nyappdiv-1985.