People v. Curtron M.
This text of 49 A.D.3d 318 (People v. Curtron M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). The credible police testimony adduced at the hearing satisfied the People’s burden of establishing that defendant agreed to waive his Miranda rights. To the extent that defendant is arguing that suppression of his statement is warranted as a sanction for the loss of a Miranda warnings form, we find that argument without merit. Concur—Tom, J.P., Buckley, Sweeny and Moskowitz, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 A.D.3d 318, 852 N.Y.2d 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-curtron-m-nyappdiv-2008.