People v. Curtis

25 A.D.3d 619, 806 N.Y.S.2d 883
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Curtis. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 A.D.3d 721

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Parker, J.), rendered January 26, 2004, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

[620]*620Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant did not effectively waive his right to appeal his sentence (see People v Messenger, 7 AD3d 642 [2004]; People v Boustani, 300 AD2d 313 [2002]; People v Dongo, 244 AD2d 353 [1997]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions regarding his sentence are without merit. Cozier, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Curtis, 25 A.D.3d 619, 806 N.Y.S.2d 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

25 A.D.3d 619 (People v. Curtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Messenger
7 A.D.3d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Dongo
244 A.D.2d 353 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Boustani
300 A.D.2d 313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)