People v. Curtis
This text of 718 N.W.2d 333 (People v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Eugene T. CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motions to add issue, for appointment of counsel, for bail, and for miscellaneous relief are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
718 N.W.2d 333, 476 Mich. 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-curtis-mich-2006.